Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Gabriel Debru vs Ryan Nijboer Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Debru vs Nijboer analysis and find out who is favored!
Gabriel Debru vs Ryan Nijboer Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Debru 0 - 2 Nijboer
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Debru has won 46.89% of points on his second serve, while Nijboer has won 49.47%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Debru, in recent form, has won 47.92% of his opponent's second serve points, while Nijboer has won 54.05%. The same stats for first serve returns are 37.2% and 36.05% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Debru has saved 50% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nijboer has saved 52.99% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Debru has won 58.06% of matches played (W/L 36/ 26), with Nijboer winning 64.21% (W/L 61/ 34) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Debru has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 48/ 30), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 42% (W/L 15/ 21). Nijboer has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 93/ 64), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 24% (W/L 4/ 13).
- Player level: In the last year, Debru has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 52.27% of matches (W/L 23/ 21), where as Nijboer has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 70% of matches (W/L 49/ 21). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Debru winning 0 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Debru winning 1 and Nijboer winning 4. The last match between Debru and Nijboer was at the Francavilla Challenger, 06-05-2024, Q3, Clay with Ryan Nijboer getting the victory 6-3 1-6 7-6(0).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:45:36.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Debru and Nijboer have played a deciding set 1 times, with Debru winning 0 times and Nijboer 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Debru winning 0, and Nijboer 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Debru has played against opponents with an average rank of 343.34 while Nijboer has played against players with an average rank of 178.72.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Debru has won 59% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nijboer has won 52% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Debru has converted 39.64% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nijboer has converted 45.66% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Debru 0 - 2 Nijboer
337
Rank
310
High
18
Age
Plays
0
Total2
0
Hard0
0
Clay2
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
463
Rank
437
High
24
Age
R
Plays
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
Form
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
L
55% (72-58)
Career Total W/L
57% (221-168)
38% (6-10)
YTD W/L
58% (19-14)
$31,000
Career Prize Money
$5,735
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Gabriel Debru | Ryan Nijboer |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 2 |
| Sets Won | 1 | 4 |
| Games Won | 20 | 26 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 8 | 11 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:45:36 | 1:45:36 |
| 1st Serve % | 71% (91/129) | 59% (87/147) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 65% (59/91) | 69% (60/87) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 42% (16/38) | 45% (27/60) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 47% (7/15) | 56% (9/16) |
| Return Points W% | 41% (60/147) | 42% (54/129) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/2) | 100% (2/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 1-6 7-6(0) |
Stats 
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Gabriel Debru
54%
(
52 of
96)
1st Serve %
64%
(
52 of
81)
2
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
6
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
35 of
52)
41%
(
18 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
46%
(
44 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
32 of
81)
84
Total Points Won
93
|
||||
| 6-3 6-2 |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Gabriel Debru
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve %
81%
(
39 of
48)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
42
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Gabriel Debru | Ryan Nijboer |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 38% (6/10) | 58% (19/14) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 42% (14/19) | 58% (45/32) |
| Games Win/Loss | 48% (154/170) | 53% (390/340) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) | 73% (8/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 46% (6/7) | 58% (11/8) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.24 | 0.34 |
| Aces Total | 38 | 119 |
| DFs per game | 0.25 | 0.38 |
| DFs Total | 39 | 134 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:37:57 | 1:50:41 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 375.06 | 239.58 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (648/970) | 59% (1354/2279) |
| 1st Serve W% | 65% (419/648) | 69% (929/1354) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (151/322) | 50% (462/925) |
| BPs Won% Total | 40% (44/111) | 44% (120/270) |
| Return Pts W% | 41% (434/1056) | 42% (997/2356) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 38% (6/10) | 50% (8/8) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 65% (11/6) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 40% (6/15) | 58% (19/33) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 43% (3/7) | 55% (6/11) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/2) | 36% (4/11) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (6/6) | 77% (22/17) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (6/0) | 23% (22/5) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (10/0) | 18% (11/2) |
Gabriel Debru Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Gabriel Debru
54%
(
52 of
96)
1st Serve %
64%
(
52 of
81)
2
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
6
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
35 of
52)
41%
(
18 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
46%
(
44 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
32 of
81)
84
Total Points Won
93
|
6-3 1-6 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gabriel Debru
Player
Federico Iannaccone
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
72%
(
57 of
79)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
42 of
79)
76
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Valentin Vacherot
Player
Gabriel Debru
69%
(
55 of
80)
1st Serve %
57%
(
44 of
77)
7
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
33 of
44)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
25 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
26 of
77)
81
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(2) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Gabriel Debru
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve %
81%
(
39 of
48)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gabriel Debru
Player
Miguel Damas
74%
(
45 of
61)
1st Serve %
75%
(
56 of
75)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
31%
(
5 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
39%
(
24 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
36 of
75)
73
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Billy Harris
Player
Gabriel Debru
75%
(
12 of
16)
1st Serve %
62%
(
13 of
21)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
75%
(
9 of
12)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
75%
(
3 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
14 of
21)
26
Total Points Won
11
|
6-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gabriel Debru
Player
Iliyan Radulov
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
35%
(
16 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
58
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gabriel Debru
Player
Sergi Perez Contri
75%
(
59 of
79)
1st Serve %
67%
(
56 of
84)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
9
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
30%
(
6 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
46%
(
36 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
44 of
84)
87
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gabriel Debru
Player
Ian Luca Cervantes Tomas
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve %
58%
(
40 of
69)
0
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
41%
(
25 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
33 of
69)
69
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Ryan Nijboer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Vilius Gaubas
Player
Ryan Nijboer
66%
(
66 of
100)
1st Serve %
74%
(
72 of
97)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
8
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
44 of
72)
62%
(
21 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
38%
(
38 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
43 of
97)
105
Total Points Won
92
|
6-7(1) 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Franco Agamenone
Player
Ryan Nijboer
70%
(
45 of
64)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
58%
(
26 of
45)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Federico Arnaboldi
61%
(
41 of
67)
1st Serve %
52%
(
31 of
60)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
7
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
7 of
29)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
46%
(
31 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Shintaro Mochizuki
51%
(
37 of
72)
1st Serve %
54%
(
36 of
67)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
6
51%
(
19 of
37)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
46%
(
33 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
34 of
67)
73
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Gabriel Debru
54%
(
52 of
96)
1st Serve %
64%
(
52 of
81)
2
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
6
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
35 of
52)
41%
(
18 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
46%
(
44 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
32 of
81)
84
Total Points Won
93
|
6-3 1-6 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Laurent Lokoli
53%
(
24 of
45)
1st Serve %
61%
(
42 of
69)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alejandro Moro Canas
Player
Ryan Nijboer
69%
(
78 of
113)
1st Serve %
60%
(
70 of
116)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
64%
(
50 of
78)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
46 of
70)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
39%
(
44 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
50 of
116)
119
Total Points Won
110
|
6-7(1) 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Francesco Passaro
64%
(
48 of
75)
1st Serve %
63%
(
48 of
76)
4
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
34 of
48)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
25 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
29 of
76)
79
Total Points Won
72
|
6-2 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Gabriel Debru
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve %
81%
(
39 of
48)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Marius Copil
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve %
59%
(
38 of
64)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
16 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Debru Vs Nijboer Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
